Wow, it has been a while. The start of the quarter. Those words breathe fear into every faculty member. Not only does it mean frantic course prep, but students in and out of your office trying to get scheudles lined up and colleauges wanting to start on those projects you put off last qurter. I am happy to report it hasn’t gone bad, just franticly. I have been trying to get some research articles out to our ACE conference. My master’s student and I have done an interesting piece looking at student published agriculture magazines in ag communication curriculum. There are a few out there, and they vary as much as the schools do. I am working on a new professional website. I will share it when it is done.
I have started our first ag comm web design course here at OSU. It is going great! We are not only learning Dreamweaver, but we are jumping full board into exploring best practices of Web 2.0. Students even have an opportunity to do a YouTube promo video for the major. I hope they take me up on it (it is for extra credit).
“The third-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the majority. The second-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the minority. The first-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking.”
– AA Milne
Many researchers and instructors (including myself) have been exploring how social networking technology can be successfully integrated into the classroom to enhance students’ experiences. While I am still undecided on the viability and usefulness of education in realms like second life, I am interested in their possibilities. I tend to be worried that sometimes we jump into technology because it is the new cool thing and not necessarily because it is the best thing. A recent article I read talked about a new island being formed in Second Life to help instructors learn to use the new world in their classrooms. I applaud this university for taking charge of the many instructors teaching in Second Life and helping to offer best tips. I can’t wait to navigate my avatar there to explore what they have to say.
It is the end of the quarter and that means frantic students, grading, and the crazy idea I might get a few weeks to catch up. As the calls, emails, facebook messages swarm around me from alumni looking for jobs, friends wanting to connect, colleagues wanting me to work on projects with me, and students finishing the quarter and looking to the next, I must say I am over-communicated. I love communication and technology. I could read about it, research it, and talk about it forever. But for a few hours I want to escape it! So please forgive my absence blogging for a few days.
Well I am on the road collecting data for a research study on critical thinking I am doing with several others from around the country. We are spending three days at the University of Florida doing interviews with over 135 students. I am really excited about this research, it could be pretty groundbreaking.
I travel a lot to conferences and such over the year, and as any good techy I always have my laptop, iphone and such in my bag! I found it funny however that on this trip as my husband was dropping me off at the airport (a place he knows well being in sales and traveling more than I) he asked if I had everything like my laptop and phone. Now, I remember trips of the past, like studying in Prague or flying to National FFA convention when my mother and father, or as time went on my husband, would ask if I packed everything like my toothbrush. But now that isn’t important, it is more important whether or not I can check my email while I am away. Wow the world has changed!
Ag communicators are heavily moving online. A study I did of agriculture magazines 5 years ago showed that. Do a Google search for ag media and you will find everything from commodity groups to farm broadcasters all working to spread the message of agriculture and rural life online.
While this is a great thing, we must continue our traditional communication practices. When I started researching new media in agriculture I was driven by the numbers of farmers who were not online. Many people at that point 6 years ago felt that this was changing. While it is to a point, a recent report by Pew’s Internet and American Life Project shows that we still have a way to go in rural America. According to their research in 2007 only 60% of rural Americans are Internet users (they note 73% of urban citizens are users). It is obvious there is still a rural-urban digital divide, even though it is very small. For those followers of Everett Rogers’s Diffusion Theory we still have reached all of those late adopters, let alone the laggards.